Optic A2

The Optic lineup spans six builds across carbon and aluminum frames, with suspension and drivetrain specifications scaling to match the price points. The flagship C1 build features Fox Factory suspension, a SRAM X0 Eagle Transmission, and We Are One carbon wheels laced to Industry Nine hubs. Moving down the carbon tier, the C2 and C2 MX models shift to RockShox Select+ or Fox Performance Elite suspension and SRAM GX Eagle Transmissions, offering a strong balance of performance and durability. The C2 MX specifically swaps to a mixed-wheel setup and equips heavy-duty SRAM Maven Silver brakes.

The C3 serves as the entry point for the carbon frame, utilizing a RockShox Pike Select fork, a Shimano Deore and XT mixed 12-speed drivetrain, and Shimano MT520 four-piston brakes. For riders preferring metal frames, the A1 and A2 builds mirror the aggressive intent of the carbon models. The A1 features Fox Factory suspension and a SRAM GX Eagle Transmission, while the A2 provides a more accessible entry with a RockShox Pike Base fork and a Shimano Deore drivetrain. Across the range, Norco specifies aggressive Maxxis Minion DHF and Dissector tires, ensuring the contact patch matches the frame's descending capabilities.

Reviewers agree that the high-pivot design fundamentally alters the Optic's descending character, allowing it to absorb impacts far better than a typical short-travel bike. The rearward axle path excels at smoothing square edges, having "sliced them down to a fraction of their size" (Theradavist), creating a ride that remains remarkably "calm and composed" (Theloamwolf) through fast, choppy sections. Despite this stability, the bike retains a lively demeanor, encouraging riders to "generate plenty of speed by pumping through rollers" (Enduro MTB).

On climbs, the steep seat tube angle and active suspension provide excellent traction on technical ascents. However, the idler pulley introduces a distinct tradeoff. While some testers found the drivetrain drag negligible, others noted a spongy feel under hard pedaling and experienced chain retention issues in rough terrain. The bike's lengthening rear center under compression also drew mixed reactions; it enhances high-speed stability but can feel slightly vague or cumbersome in tight, slow-speed corners.

A recurring critique across early test models centered on the stock braking power, with multiple reviewers finding the originally specified cross-country brakes inadequate for the bike's aggressive descending capabilities. Ultimately, the consensus points to a highly capable, gravity-focused trail bike that rewards precise, dynamic riding, provided the owner is willing to maintain the idler drivetrain.